)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":15343,"name":"Tim Burke","email":"tburke@nvidia.com","username":"tburke"},"change_message_id":"1e070ff831838dae83240a03c3c803a59cc641bb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"06c94522_ff49080a","updated":"2025-05-30 21:43:24.000000000","message":"OK, so how much do we care about `DisplayName`s?\n```\n2025-05-30 21:34:08.302023 | controller |     self.assertEqual(access_key, resp[\u0027Owner\u0027][\u0027DisplayName\u0027])\n2025-05-30 21:34:08.303510 | controller | E   AssertionError: \u0027s3-user1\u0027 !\u003d \u0027swiftprojecttest1:swiftusertest1\u0027\n2025-05-30 21:34:08.303536 | controller | E   - s3-user1\n2025-05-30 21:34:08.303542 | controller | E   + swiftprojecttest1:swiftusertest1\n```\nI\u0027m a little tempted to add this to `_sanitize_obj_listing` over in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/951443 ...","commit_id":"775bfda5da103e5166598972d83a59c6d28fbf58"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"daf4d7848bb68a6f94287bdd49257b522886de56","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":8,"id":"ec580c9e_cea1a8c4","updated":"2025-11-06 10:18:25.000000000","message":"This patch seems to do the opposite of the commit message. DisplayName is no longer returned by s3, so we stopped asserting it a while back, see Ia915a65313394910c74ae826c912b5549e833a7b.","commit_id":"e2fd187f3ab7fa8a116206cadd3b653fd0662464"}]}