)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":34930,"name":"Jianjian Huo","email":"jhuo@nvidia.com","username":"jhuo"},"change_message_id":"62e6f3337803a23519f031d9bc447a8c9d80a8f8","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":""},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"Cons:"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":""},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"  * The only way to create a Timestamp without jitter is to parse an"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"    existing timestamp *string*. This almost exclusively impacts only"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"    tests."},{"line_number":22,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"2a34c6dc_06a0c277","line":19,"updated":"2026-02-24 05:24:37.000000000","message":"now I figure out why \"the timestamp with jitter is a version 2 timestamp\":\n1. the jitter in the hex part starts with prefix ``2``\n2. all new timestamps minted after have to use jitter, it\u0027s not permitted to only have offset in the hex part ``2.......oooooo``\n3. so the previous existing timestamps all have hex part \u003c prefix ``2``.\n\nFor patch carrying purpose, I do like the new interface better, much less ambiguity than the previous iteration.","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"e24b4abe236f8b033791ca8362fc38fa66f55552","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":18,"context_line":""},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"  * The only way to create a Timestamp without jitter is to parse an"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"    existing timestamp *string*. This almost exclusively impacts only"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"    tests."},{"line_number":22,"context_line":""},{"line_number":23,"context_line":"  * There\u0027s a risk that a dev types Timestamp(float) when they should"},{"line_number":24,"context_line":"    type NormalTimestamp(float), and the timestamp has unintended"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"40445fc1_be7c5374","line":21,"updated":"2026-02-23 21:34:26.000000000","message":"what you mean \"almost\" ???","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"dbbc7ae913ecd6466eee2e85e01557c1b0c26d3f","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":18,"context_line":""},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"  * The only way to create a Timestamp without jitter is to parse an"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"    existing timestamp *string*. This almost exclusively impacts only"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"    tests."},{"line_number":22,"context_line":""},{"line_number":23,"context_line":"  * There\u0027s a risk that a dev types Timestamp(float) when they should"},{"line_number":24,"context_line":"    type NormalTimestamp(float), and the timestamp has unintended"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"ee25c1a4_17c5f7cd","line":21,"in_reply_to":"40445fc1_be7c5374","updated":"2026-02-24 12:59:11.000000000","message":"See timestamp.decode_timestamps","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"e24b4abe236f8b033791ca8362fc38fa66f55552","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":21,"context_line":"    tests."},{"line_number":22,"context_line":""},{"line_number":23,"context_line":"  * There\u0027s a risk that a dev types Timestamp(float) when they should"},{"line_number":24,"context_line":"    type NormalTimestamp(float), and the timestamp has unintended"},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"    jitter. But note that the constructor is NOT the preferred way to"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"    mint a Timestamp."},{"line_number":27,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"05552b57_5f5d0dea","line":24,"updated":"2026-02-23 21:34:26.000000000","message":"I think this should be expected and addresses some of the concerns about \"when a timestamp is a v2 timestamp\" directly.","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":15343,"name":"Tim Burke","email":"tburke@nvidia.com","username":"tburke"},"change_message_id":"0e67e37914e5f30621a13909e484d436bccc9a2e","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":22,"context_line":""},{"line_number":23,"context_line":"  * There\u0027s a risk that a dev types Timestamp(float) when they should"},{"line_number":24,"context_line":"    type NormalTimestamp(float), and the timestamp has unintended"},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"    jitter. But note that the constructor is NOT the preferred way to"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"    mint a Timestamp."},{"line_number":27,"context_line":""},{"line_number":28,"context_line":"  * The Timestamp constructor is no longer backwards compatible in terms"},{"line_number":29,"context_line":"    of hax part content."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"482c643a_effb2d17","line":26,"range":{"start_line":25,"start_character":12,"end_line":26,"end_character":21},"updated":"2026-02-23 19:26:36.000000000","message":"Just so we\u0027re clear/explicit: the *preferred way* to mint a Timestamp is with `Timestamp.now()`, yes? And the *constructor*, by contrast, is the preferred way to *parse* a Timestamp?","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"dbbc7ae913ecd6466eee2e85e01557c1b0c26d3f","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":22,"context_line":""},{"line_number":23,"context_line":"  * There\u0027s a risk that a dev types Timestamp(float) when they should"},{"line_number":24,"context_line":"    type NormalTimestamp(float), and the timestamp has unintended"},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"    jitter. But note that the constructor is NOT the preferred way to"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"    mint a Timestamp."},{"line_number":27,"context_line":""},{"line_number":28,"context_line":"  * The Timestamp constructor is no longer backwards compatible in terms"},{"line_number":29,"context_line":"    of hax part content."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"07d487c2_087900db","line":26,"range":{"start_line":25,"start_character":12,"end_line":26,"end_character":21},"in_reply_to":"482c643a_effb2d17","updated":"2026-02-24 12:59:11.000000000","message":"\u003e the preferred way to mint a Timestamp is with Timestamp.now(), yes?\n\ncorrect\n\nFurthermore, the preferred way to mint a timestamp (lower case) is with ``timestamp.make_timestamp_now`` which will return a ``Timestamp`` or ``NormalTimestamp`` as appropriate\n\n\u003e And the constructor, by contrast, is the preferred way to parse a Timestamp?\n\ncorrect\n\nI can imagine shifting to a Timestamp.parse() method and making the constructor dumber. I\u0027m not yet sure how much churn that would be.","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"e24b4abe236f8b033791ca8362fc38fa66f55552","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":26,"context_line":"    mint a Timestamp."},{"line_number":27,"context_line":""},{"line_number":28,"context_line":"  * The Timestamp constructor is no longer backwards compatible in terms"},{"line_number":29,"context_line":"    of hax part content."},{"line_number":30,"context_line":""},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"Change-Id: I624cb0881ed7bd5b3717b450d820e1761b5a3421"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"Signed-off-by: Alistair Coles \u003calistairncoles@gmail.com\u003e"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"322dd348_db08e113","line":29,"updated":"2026-02-23 21:34:26.000000000","message":"perhaps fair, but we\u0027d already decided we wanted this \"fix\" for `Timestamp.now()` - so i\u0027m not sure why we\u0027d allow *that* to be \"incompatible\" (for anyone looking close enough) but not `Timestamp(float)` (which we maybe don\u0027t even really *want*\u0026?!)","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"dbbc7ae913ecd6466eee2e85e01557c1b0c26d3f","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":26,"context_line":"    mint a Timestamp."},{"line_number":27,"context_line":""},{"line_number":28,"context_line":"  * The Timestamp constructor is no longer backwards compatible in terms"},{"line_number":29,"context_line":"    of hax part content."},{"line_number":30,"context_line":""},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"Change-Id: I624cb0881ed7bd5b3717b450d820e1761b5a3421"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"Signed-off-by: Alistair Coles \u003calistairncoles@gmail.com\u003e"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"4c54b597_e3e49211","line":29,"in_reply_to":"322dd348_db08e113","updated":"2026-02-24 12:59:11.000000000","message":"You\u0027re right to point out that ``Timestamp.now()`` has already deviated from the legacy return value.\n\nI do think we need to consider what backwards compatible means for out-of-tree users of ``Timestamp``:\n\nIf someone is using ``Timestamp.now().internal``, just as Swift previously did, as a way to normalize ``time.time()``, then they might get broken by the returned string now having a hex part. In this case they might have thanked us for leaving the behaviour as it was.\n\nIf someone is using ``Timestamp.now().internal`` to set an ``x-timestamp`` header then they may or may not trigger a 400 or 500 when the updated proxy app validates their ``x-timestamp`` that will now have jitter. In this case we need them to become aware that ``req.ensure_x_timestamp()`` is the correct way.\n\nArguably, we might want to leave a deprecated implementation of ``Timestamp`` that does exactly what it used to, that we do not use in-tree, and rename our new thing.","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"}],"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"b6381480da8b6d0f658670635ca69f9a29e89d8b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3faa0e70_b54d02d2","updated":"2026-02-23 21:29:55.000000000","message":"\u003e sq?Timestamp: make jitter default, remove extended kwarg","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":7233,"name":"Matthew Oliver","email":"matt@oliver.net.au","username":"mattoliverau"},"change_message_id":"b4e1b948f9214f10b3285c219e515ff9866b100b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ad5a3914_df24e4ee","updated":"2026-02-24 09:27:05.000000000","message":"yeah +2 on the constructor doing 2 things, parsing strings and creating using a float. being able to pick up older timestamps (without jitter, or really any already used timestamp in the system) via parsing it as a string makes sense. Seeing as the way to create them is really via the .now() method.\n\nSo yeah I can get onboard this! Sqaush away I say!","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"e24b4abe236f8b033791ca8362fc38fa66f55552","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"1a20719c_ce523a36","in_reply_to":"3faa0e70_b54d02d2","updated":"2026-02-23 21:34:26.000000000","message":"\u003e sq?\n\nyes, pls\n\n\u003e make jitter default\n\nhow can it be this simple?!\n\n\u003e remove extended kwarg\n\nmy mind is blown away by this diff.  Down with `Timestamp(\u003cfloat\u003e)`!  This has *got* to be the right direction!","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"}],"swift/common/utils/timestamp.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"b6381480da8b6d0f658670635ca69f9a29e89d8b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":356,"context_line":"            time that can be represented by this class."},{"line_number":357,"context_line":"        :param extended: If True and ``timestamp`` is not a string then a"},{"line_number":358,"context_line":"            random jitter amount will be inserted into the hex part. Default is"},{"line_number":359,"context_line":"            False."},{"line_number":360,"context_line":"        \"\"\""},{"line_number":361,"context_line":"        if isinstance(timestamp, (float, int)):"},{"line_number":362,"context_line":"            float_part, hex_part \u003d self._create(timestamp, extended\u003dextended)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"861c7bac_a96055b6","side":"PARENT","line":359,"updated":"2026-02-23 21:29:55.000000000","message":"am I reading this diff correctly?  This was *already* only used by tests?","commit_id":"026fe0c57bae6f6bef354f2e627120834f9de446"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"dbbc7ae913ecd6466eee2e85e01557c1b0c26d3f","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":356,"context_line":"            time that can be represented by this class."},{"line_number":357,"context_line":"        :param extended: If True and ``timestamp`` is not a string then a"},{"line_number":358,"context_line":"            random jitter amount will be inserted into the hex part. Default is"},{"line_number":359,"context_line":"            False."},{"line_number":360,"context_line":"        \"\"\""},{"line_number":361,"context_line":"        if isinstance(timestamp, (float, int)):"},{"line_number":362,"context_line":"            float_part, hex_part \u003d self._create(timestamp, extended\u003dextended)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"6d6f09ca_48cb50e9","side":"PARENT","line":359,"in_reply_to":"861c7bac_a96055b6","updated":"2026-02-24 12:59:11.000000000","message":"It was used (set to the non-default True) in ``Timestamp.now()``.\n\nBut, yes!, it is very much worth noting that aspects of the legacy Timestamp interface would seem to have been driven by test convenience, and despite our test cleanup efforts, there are likely still aspects that are lingering just for tests.\n\nI may be repeating myself, but part of the reason I went for the extended kwarg was that *conceptually* it seemed inconsistent for a caller to get to specify the float but not specify the presence of jitter or not. But *practically* we almost always *do* want jitter, and in prod code callers *don\u0027t* specify the float part, they use ``Timestamp.now()`` !?!","commit_id":"026fe0c57bae6f6bef354f2e627120834f9de446"},{"author":{"_account_id":15343,"name":"Tim Burke","email":"tburke@nvidia.com","username":"tburke"},"change_message_id":"0e67e37914e5f30621a13909e484d436bccc9a2e","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":354,"context_line":"            if the given timestamp is less than 0 or greater than the maximum"},{"line_number":355,"context_line":"            time that can be represented by this class."},{"line_number":356,"context_line":"        \"\"\""},{"line_number":357,"context_line":"        if isinstance(timestamp, (float, int)):"},{"line_number":358,"context_line":"            float_part, hex_part \u003d self._create(timestamp)"},{"line_number":359,"context_line":"        else:"},{"line_number":360,"context_line":"            float_part, hex_part \u003d self._parse(timestamp)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"90d88483_aa2a8127","line":357,"updated":"2026-02-23 19:26:36.000000000","message":"Hrm.\n\nShould (could?) we just start disallowing this? Like,\n```\n        if isinstance(timestamp, (float, int)):\n            raise ValueError(\u0027Use Timestamp.create() instead\u0027)\n```\n(and switch `def _create` to `def create`)?\n\nIt seems like a lot of the ambiguity/confusion stems from this split behavior, and I like removing split behaviors when/where we can.","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"dbbc7ae913ecd6466eee2e85e01557c1b0c26d3f","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":354,"context_line":"            if the given timestamp is less than 0 or greater than the maximum"},{"line_number":355,"context_line":"            time that can be represented by this class."},{"line_number":356,"context_line":"        \"\"\""},{"line_number":357,"context_line":"        if isinstance(timestamp, (float, int)):"},{"line_number":358,"context_line":"            float_part, hex_part \u003d self._create(timestamp)"},{"line_number":359,"context_line":"        else:"},{"line_number":360,"context_line":"            float_part, hex_part \u003d self._parse(timestamp)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"6c54e0f7_17094aac","line":357,"in_reply_to":"90d88483_aa2a8127","updated":"2026-02-24 12:59:11.000000000","message":"I think we *could*. IIUC then I think ``Timestamp.now()`` might already be the interface equivalent to ``.create()``.\n\nI expect there to be fallout in tests. I\u0027m not sure how many places still rely on the short cut of ``Timestamp(\u003cfloat\u003e)``. And ``make_timestamp_iter`` would need to change.\n\nBut given how far we have come, a few hundred more lines of test churn might be worth it to get it right!","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"dbbc7ae913ecd6466eee2e85e01557c1b0c26d3f","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":592,"context_line":"        if delta:"},{"line_number":593,"context_line":"            # XXX we\u0027ve lost the original hexpart when encoding, so we have no"},{"line_number":594,"context_line":"            # choice other than to force zero jitter to avoid varying results"},{"line_number":595,"context_line":"            t2 \u003d Timestamp(str((t1.raw + delta) * PRECISION))"},{"line_number":596,"context_line":"    elif not explicit:"},{"line_number":597,"context_line":"        t2 \u003d t1"},{"line_number":598,"context_line":"    if len(parts) \u003e 2:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"a59a95a9_6afe47a6","line":595,"updated":"2026-02-24 12:59:11.000000000","message":"@Clay here\u0027s the non-test impact 😞\n\nI can\u0027t use NormalTimestamp here because callers expect to get back a tuple of Timestamp instances. We could change the caller\u0027s expectations...but given that the input to this function is a string it doesn\u0027t feel terrible to cast the value back to a string here in order to *parse* a Timestamp i.e. we are *parsing* component timestamps in this context.","commit_id":"6addd3f58a007de9d4747e9fdf13f73994b1bf78"}],"test/unit/container/test_sync.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"b6381480da8b6d0f658670635ca69f9a29e89d8b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":838,"context_line":""},{"line_number":839,"context_line":"            sync.uuid \u003d FakeUUID"},{"line_number":840,"context_line":"            with mock_timestamp_randint(0xa):"},{"line_number":841,"context_line":"                ts_data \u003d Timestamp(1.1, extended\u003dTrue)"},{"line_number":842,"context_line":""},{"line_number":843,"context_line":"            def fake_delete_object(path, name\u003dNone, headers\u003dNone, proxy\u003dNone,"},{"line_number":844,"context_line":"                                   logger\u003dNone, timeout\u003dNone):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"c8117083_1e4181ed","side":"PARENT","line":841,"updated":"2026-02-23 21:29:55.000000000","message":"this looks good!  This is what we want.","commit_id":"026fe0c57bae6f6bef354f2e627120834f9de446"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"dbbc7ae913ecd6466eee2e85e01557c1b0c26d3f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":838,"context_line":""},{"line_number":839,"context_line":"            sync.uuid \u003d FakeUUID"},{"line_number":840,"context_line":"            with mock_timestamp_randint(0xa):"},{"line_number":841,"context_line":"                ts_data \u003d Timestamp(1.1, extended\u003dTrue)"},{"line_number":842,"context_line":""},{"line_number":843,"context_line":"            def fake_delete_object(path, name\u003dNone, headers\u003dNone, proxy\u003dNone,"},{"line_number":844,"context_line":"                                   logger\u003dNone, timeout\u003dNone):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"e2604c09_a71964ec","side":"PARENT","line":841,"in_reply_to":"c8117083_1e4181ed","updated":"2026-02-24 12:59:11.000000000","message":"Acknowledged","commit_id":"026fe0c57bae6f6bef354f2e627120834f9de446"}],"test/unit/obj/test_reconstructor.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"b6381480da8b6d0f658670635ca69f9a29e89d8b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":225,"context_line":"        # object fragments in place, not just part dirs, so we\u0027ll create them"},{"line_number":226,"context_line":"        # all here...."},{"line_number":227,"context_line":"        t \u003d 1421181937.70054  # time.time()"},{"line_number":228,"context_line":"        ts \u003d utils.Timestamp(t, extended\u003dTrue)"},{"line_number":229,"context_line":"        with mock.patch(\u0027swift.obj.diskfile.time\u0027) as mock_time:"},{"line_number":230,"context_line":"            # since (a) we are using a fixed time here to create"},{"line_number":231,"context_line":"            # frags which corresponds to all the hardcoded hashes and"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"a16e3d07_ce49a5cc","side":"PARENT","line":228,"updated":"2026-02-23 21:29:55.000000000","message":"nice!","commit_id":"026fe0c57bae6f6bef354f2e627120834f9de446"},{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"dbbc7ae913ecd6466eee2e85e01557c1b0c26d3f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":225,"context_line":"        # object fragments in place, not just part dirs, so we\u0027ll create them"},{"line_number":226,"context_line":"        # all here...."},{"line_number":227,"context_line":"        t \u003d 1421181937.70054  # time.time()"},{"line_number":228,"context_line":"        ts \u003d utils.Timestamp(t, extended\u003dTrue)"},{"line_number":229,"context_line":"        with mock.patch(\u0027swift.obj.diskfile.time\u0027) as mock_time:"},{"line_number":230,"context_line":"            # since (a) we are using a fixed time here to create"},{"line_number":231,"context_line":"            # frags which corresponds to all the hardcoded hashes and"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"495f9da5_446b429a","side":"PARENT","line":228,"in_reply_to":"a16e3d07_ce49a5cc","updated":"2026-02-24 12:59:11.000000000","message":"Acknowledged","commit_id":"026fe0c57bae6f6bef354f2e627120834f9de446"}]}