)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":38496,"name":"Andressa Cabistani","display_name":"Andressa","email":"acabistani@gmail.com","username":"andressadotpy"},"change_message_id":"9723561337a1932eabb552d6e75532796b27de43","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":11,"id":"7af0df5a_79ceae08","updated":"2026-06-11 14:45:17.000000000","message":"This looks pretty good to me. I would prefer a unit test for timeout but I\u0027m also fine with leaving it like this.\n\nI was afraid of a potential race condition in ThreadResult but I tested with 300,000+ operations and no race found because CPython\u0027s thread.join() provides sufficient memory barrier.\n\nI also tested the behavior when deadline expires (remaining \u003c\u003d0) and wait(timeout\u003d0) correctly returns result if thread already completed, times out if still running. Perfect for deadline scenarios.","commit_id":"3c4ff69310d0b5d73c7444c1f8746a28e9e82b47"}]}