)]}'
{"id":"openstack%2Fswift~983265","triplet_id":"openstack%2Fswift~master~I90330e39b9f5b89ba092d9056ae86e6d1ab2aae6","project":"openstack/swift","branch":"master","topic":"whalbawi.test-obj-clock-skew","hashtags":[],"change_id":"I90330e39b9f5b89ba092d9056ae86e6d1ab2aae6","subject":"DNM: add probe test for stale-timestamp PUT object request","status":"ABANDONED","created":"2026-04-02 22:57:19.000000000","updated":"2026-04-02 22:57:56.000000000","total_comment_count":0,"unresolved_comment_count":0,"has_review_started":true,"meta_rev_id":"afd3dac056e1376287a97167f4aff376a5cdfeb1","_number":983265,"virtual_id_number":983265,"owner":{"_account_id":38767,"name":"Wael Halbawi","display_name":"Wael Halbawi","email":"whalbawi@nvidia.com","username":"whalbawi"},"actions":{},"labels":{"Verified":{"values":{"-2":"Fails","-1":"Doesn\u0027t seem to work"," 0":"No score","+1":"Works for me","+2":"Verified"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true},"Code-Review":{"values":{"-2":"Do not merge","-1":"This patch needs further work before it can be merged"," 0":"No score","+1":"Looks good to me, but someone else must approve","+2":"Looks good to me (core reviewer)"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true},"Workflow":{"values":{"-1":"Work in progress"," 0":"Ready for reviews","+1":"Approved"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true}},"removable_reviewers":[],"reviewers":{},"pending_reviewers":{},"reviewer_updates":[],"messages":[{"id":"09c558050571b3a39da14bdb4f59162ae23e60ac","tag":"autogenerated:gerrit:newPatchSet","author":{"_account_id":38767,"name":"Wael Halbawi","display_name":"Wael Halbawi","email":"whalbawi@nvidia.com","username":"whalbawi"},"date":"2026-04-02 22:57:19.000000000","message":"Uploaded patch set 1.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"afd3dac056e1376287a97167f4aff376a5cdfeb1","tag":"autogenerated:gerrit:abandon","author":{"_account_id":38767,"name":"Wael Halbawi","display_name":"Wael Halbawi","email":"whalbawi@nvidia.com","username":"whalbawi"},"date":"2026-04-02 22:57:56.000000000","message":"Abandoned","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1}],"current_revision_number":1,"current_revision":"8fa7eff3167e9df43d76402e78768828140c1ec8","revisions":{"8fa7eff3167e9df43d76402e78768828140c1ec8":{"kind":"REWORK","_number":1,"created":"2026-04-02 22:57:19.000000000","uploader":{"_account_id":38767,"name":"Wael Halbawi","display_name":"Wael Halbawi","email":"whalbawi@nvidia.com","username":"whalbawi"},"ref":"refs/changes/65/983265/1","fetch":{"anonymous http":{"url":"https://review.opendev.org/openstack/swift","ref":"refs/changes/65/983265/1","commands":{"Checkout":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/swift refs/changes/65/983265/1 \u0026\u0026 git checkout FETCH_HEAD","Cherry Pick":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/swift refs/changes/65/983265/1 \u0026\u0026 git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD","Format Patch":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/swift refs/changes/65/983265/1 \u0026\u0026 git format-patch -1 --stdout FETCH_HEAD","Pull":"git pull https://review.opendev.org/openstack/swift refs/changes/65/983265/1"}}},"commit":{"parents":[{"commit":"694d25bb1a87f9426ac7ad1f3817c51f5bf13a34","subject":"Improved offset support in Timestamp.__invert__","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/swift/commit/694d25bb1a87f9426ac7ad1f3817c51f5bf13a34"}]}],"author":{"name":"Wael Halbawi","email":"whalbawi@nvidia.com","date":"2026-04-02 22:19:09.000000000","tz":-420},"committer":{"name":"Wael Halbawi","email":"whalbawi@nvidia.com","date":"2026-04-02 22:57:08.000000000","tz":-420},"subject":"DNM: add probe test for stale-timestamp PUT object request","message":"DNM: add probe test for stale-timestamp PUT object request\n\nWhen a PUT request arrives at the object server with an X-Timestamp\nolder than the existing object due to e.g. clock skew at the proxy\nserver, it returns a 409 Conflict. Consequently, the proxy server\nresponds back to the client with a 202 Accepted, although the request is\nnever queued for further processing, potentially losing the update\nforever.\n\nAdd a probe test that exercises this path:\n1. PUT an object normally through the proxy server.\n2. HEAD the object to retrieve the stored X-Timestamp.\n3. PUT again with a stale X-Timestamp using `InternalClient`.\n4. Assert the proxy returns a 5xx server error.\n5. GET the object and verify the original content is intact.\n\nBoth replicated and EC storage policies are covered in this test.\n\nThe choice of 202 Accepted as a response code seems to be first\nintroduced in `305e4b41f`, as part of the work to support container\nsyncing.\n\nChange-Id: I90330e39b9f5b89ba092d9056ae86e6d1ab2aae6\nSigned-off-by: Wael Halbawi \u003cwhalbawi@nvidia.com\u003e\n","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/swift/commit/8fa7eff3167e9df43d76402e78768828140c1ec8"}],"resolve_conflicts_web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/swift/commit/8fa7eff3167e9df43d76402e78768828140c1ec8"}]},"branch":"refs/heads/master"}},"requirements":[],"submit_records":[],"submit_requirements":[{"name":"Verified","description":"Verified in gate by CI","status":"UNSATISFIED","is_legacy":false,"submittability_expression_result":{"expression":"label:Verified\u003dMAX AND -label:Verified\u003dMIN","fulfilled":false,"status":"FAIL","passing_atoms":[],"failing_atoms":["label:Verified\u003dMAX","label:Verified\u003dMIN"],"atom_explanations":{}}},{"name":"Code-Review","description":"Code reviewed by core reviewer","status":"UNSATISFIED","is_legacy":false,"submittability_expression_result":{"expression":"label:Code-Review\u003dMAX AND -label:Code-Review\u003dMIN","fulfilled":false,"status":"FAIL","passing_atoms":[],"failing_atoms":["label:Code-Review\u003dMAX","label:Code-Review\u003dMIN"],"atom_explanations":{}}},{"name":"Workflow","description":"Approved for gate by core reviewer","status":"UNSATISFIED","is_legacy":false,"submittability_expression_result":{"expression":"label:Workflow\u003dMAX AND -label:Workflow\u003dMIN","fulfilled":false,"status":"FAIL","passing_atoms":[],"failing_atoms":["label:Workflow\u003dMAX","label:Workflow\u003dMIN"],"atom_explanations":{}}}]}