)]}'
{"tacker/tosca/utils.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":25701,"name":"Yasufumi Ogawa","email":"yasufum.o@gmail.com","username":"yasufum"},"change_message_id":"fb17179c6ba7f6834c305c0ed84feb02a9f8365d","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1299,"context_line":"                    nested_resources_dict[\u0027outputs\u0027] \u003d output"},{"line_number":1300,"context_line":"                LOG.debug(_(\u0027Added output for %s\u0027), outputname)"},{"line_number":1301,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1302,"context_line":"        yaml.SafeDumper.add_representer("},{"line_number":1303,"context_line":"            OrderedDict, lambda dumper, value: represent_odict("},{"line_number":1304,"context_line":"                dumper, \u0027tag:yaml.org,2002:map\u0027, value))"},{"line_number":1305,"context_line":"        nested_tpl[nested_resource_name] \u003d\\"},{"line_number":1306,"context_line":"            yaml.safe_dump(nested_resources_dict)"},{"line_number":1307,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"2bde9269_47e7d5ba","line":1304,"range":{"start_line":1302,"start_character":0,"end_line":1304,"end_character":56},"updated":"2021-03-04 10:43:08.000000000","message":"Could I confirm it is required to execute here every time?","commit_id":"cb803539febcd128524ef10726492737f2e4192c"},{"author":{"_account_id":31821,"name":"LiangLu","email":"lu.liang@jp.fujitsu.com","username":"LiangLu"},"change_message_id":"b2c6a30efabc9df7acfe36672be021113128af0b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1299,"context_line":"                    nested_resources_dict[\u0027outputs\u0027] \u003d output"},{"line_number":1300,"context_line":"                LOG.debug(_(\u0027Added output for %s\u0027), outputname)"},{"line_number":1301,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1302,"context_line":"        yaml.SafeDumper.add_representer("},{"line_number":1303,"context_line":"            OrderedDict, lambda dumper, value: represent_odict("},{"line_number":1304,"context_line":"                dumper, \u0027tag:yaml.org,2002:map\u0027, value))"},{"line_number":1305,"context_line":"        nested_tpl[nested_resource_name] \u003d\\"},{"line_number":1306,"context_line":"            yaml.safe_dump(nested_resources_dict)"},{"line_number":1307,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"55aea257_a88a4512","line":1304,"range":{"start_line":1302,"start_character":0,"end_line":1304,"end_character":56},"in_reply_to":"0b0f5176_da723988","updated":"2021-03-23 04:45:49.000000000","message":"I have updated a new patch to fix this part out of for loop that will note execute every time .","commit_id":"cb803539febcd128524ef10726492737f2e4192c"},{"author":{"_account_id":31821,"name":"LiangLu","email":"lu.liang@jp.fujitsu.com","username":"LiangLu"},"change_message_id":"7f4100d069c8132d816b39d52ea5ca1524b2e44a","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1299,"context_line":"                    nested_resources_dict[\u0027outputs\u0027] \u003d output"},{"line_number":1300,"context_line":"                LOG.debug(_(\u0027Added output for %s\u0027), outputname)"},{"line_number":1301,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1302,"context_line":"        yaml.SafeDumper.add_representer("},{"line_number":1303,"context_line":"            OrderedDict, lambda dumper, value: represent_odict("},{"line_number":1304,"context_line":"                dumper, \u0027tag:yaml.org,2002:map\u0027, value))"},{"line_number":1305,"context_line":"        nested_tpl[nested_resource_name] \u003d\\"},{"line_number":1306,"context_line":"            yaml.safe_dump(nested_resources_dict)"},{"line_number":1307,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"0b0f5176_da723988","line":1304,"range":{"start_line":1302,"start_character":0,"end_line":1304,"end_character":56},"in_reply_to":"2bde9269_47e7d5ba","updated":"2021-03-08 03:25:59.000000000","message":"Thanks for comment! I confirmed again this part is actually no need to execute every time,  however it need to be executed before safe_dump, I am planning to move this part to L1263, out of for loop in next patch, is that a good change?","commit_id":"cb803539febcd128524ef10726492737f2e4192c"}]}
