)]}'
{"taskflow/patterns/linear_flow.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":9648,"name":"Greg Hill","email":"greg.hill@rackspace.com","username":"jimbobhickville"},"change_message_id":"d1d96ab2f2eeccbebc4d31f4bc62b79610e1d6b4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":60,"context_line":"          decorator."},{"line_number":61,"context_line":""},{"line_number":62,"context_line":"        Object that are not the above are ignored if ``auto_create`` is"},{"line_number":63,"context_line":"        set to false, otherwise when ``auto_create`` is"},{"line_number":64,"context_line":"        true (the default), then the order of iteration will become the"},{"line_number":65,"context_line":"        objects specified ordering. On completion if **no** objects are found"},{"line_number":66,"context_line":"        out of any of the objects provided a value error will be thrown."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":16,"id":"fa69d971_6dc07b2b","line":63,"updated":"2016-01-07 18:24:35.000000000","message":"Seems to be a strange addition to me.  I can\u0027t imagine a scenario they wouldn\u0027t want the default behavior, unless they pass in a mix of objects that have order metadata and some that don\u0027t, as you might end up with more than one task at the same order (or should that indicate parallel execution?)","commit_id":"88bc5f6c129a9d8ceeff0129e45cd833ec097b6b"},{"author":{"_account_id":9648,"name":"Greg Hill","email":"greg.hill@rackspace.com","username":"jimbobhickville"},"change_message_id":"d1d96ab2f2eeccbebc4d31f4bc62b79610e1d6b4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":107,"context_line":"        # the atom from being used in the sort routine..."},{"line_number":108,"context_line":"        #"},{"line_number":109,"context_line":"        # See: http://stackoverflow.com/a/1971943"},{"line_number":110,"context_line":"        for u in sorted(units, key\u003dlambda item: item[0:1]):"},{"line_number":111,"context_line":"            f.add(u[-1])"},{"line_number":112,"context_line":"        return f"},{"line_number":113,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":16,"id":"fa69d971_8de60f15","line":110,"updated":"2016-01-07 18:24:35.000000000","message":"Isn\u0027t this the same thing as `lambda item: item[0]`, except that it\u0027ll compare it as a single-element list instead?  Is there a reason to do it that way?","commit_id":"88bc5f6c129a9d8ceeff0129e45cd833ec097b6b"}]}