)]}'
{"taskflow/storage.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":10584,"name":"Min Pae","username":"sputnik13","inactive":true},"change_message_id":"5e8f91f464ff2c296fa581234fae574557376099","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":242,"context_line":"        self._failures \u003d {}"},{"line_number":243,"context_line":""},{"line_number":244,"context_line":"    @fasteners.write_locked"},{"line_number":245,"context_line":"    def initialize(self):"},{"line_number":246,"context_line":"        \"\"\"Initializes this storage object."},{"line_number":247,"context_line":""},{"line_number":248,"context_line":"        This will:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"9a41bdd9_9dca9b4e","line":245,"updated":"2015-07-17 15:51:49.000000000","message":"while I understand the desire to keep __init__ smaller, the trouble with having a separate initialize method is you need to guard the object against access if it hasn\u0027t been initialized.  Unless lazy initialization is the intention here (which it doesn\u0027t seem like it) it would be better to refactor portions of __init__ as private methods that are called by __init__.","commit_id":"9f74cd050308f81930364c5e19ed94dd0a8f771a"},{"author":{"_account_id":9648,"name":"Greg Hill","email":"greg.hill@rackspace.com","username":"jimbobhickville"},"change_message_id":"31f76f52f5863eaf535daa7eaeac7e4a84e69b0d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":250,"context_line":"        This will:"},{"line_number":251,"context_line":""},{"line_number":252,"context_line":"        - Load any prior injected persistence values into memory."},{"line_number":253,"context_line":"        - Maps the contained flow detail\u0027s atom details names to there"},{"line_number":254,"context_line":"          corresponding uuids (for faster lookup)."},{"line_number":255,"context_line":"        - Locally loads all prior ``execute`` or ``revert`` failures from"},{"line_number":256,"context_line":"          the contained flow detail and caches them (for faster lookup)."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"1a7b0d38_da150b40","line":253,"updated":"2015-12-30 14:49:18.000000000","message":"\u0027their\u0027 not \u0027there\u0027","commit_id":"857756fdc5170e1935659cdc40913d4fbdd19ae1"}]}