)]}'
{"taskflow/atom.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":1297,"name":"Joshua Harlow","email":"jxharlow@godaddy.com","username":"harlowja"},"change_message_id":"9d00271545c22492117b919f422c9d4816741b36","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":290,"context_line":"        arg_mapping_kwargs.update(kwargs)"},{"line_number":291,"context_line":"        self._build_arg_mapping(**arg_mapping_kwargs)"},{"line_number":292,"context_line":""},{"line_number":293,"context_line":"    def remap_args_for_revert(self, **kwargs):"},{"line_number":294,"context_line":"        self._arg_mapping_method_name \u003d \u0027revert\u0027"},{"line_number":295,"context_line":"        self._rebuild_arg_mapping(**kwargs)"},{"line_number":296,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"da6ed579_a2a28ffb","line":293,"updated":"2016-01-14 00:32:56.000000000","message":"How about just being explicit with what kwargs this takes, instead of just **kwargs (which may take anything).","commit_id":"6c187e5edca784b2d4cebc7b51017e78269730ae"},{"author":{"_account_id":1297,"name":"Joshua Harlow","email":"jxharlow@godaddy.com","username":"harlowja"},"change_message_id":"d07bfeda940b2f8843921cb1c8de8a6ca5a830b5","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":290,"context_line":"        arg_mapping_kwargs.update(kwargs)"},{"line_number":291,"context_line":"        self._build_arg_mapping(**arg_mapping_kwargs)"},{"line_number":292,"context_line":""},{"line_number":293,"context_line":"    def remap_args_for_revert(self, **kwargs):"},{"line_number":294,"context_line":"        self._arg_mapping_method_name \u003d \u0027revert\u0027"},{"line_number":295,"context_line":"        self._rebuild_arg_mapping(**kwargs)"},{"line_number":296,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"da6ed579_51e32da4","line":293,"in_reply_to":"da6ed579_482f0e88","updated":"2016-01-14 19:22:26.000000000","message":"Ya, its tedious/pita but likely is better for ourselves and users as it will blow-up on invalid kwargs and docstrings will be easier to make and maintain.","commit_id":"6c187e5edca784b2d4cebc7b51017e78269730ae"},{"author":{"_account_id":9648,"name":"Greg Hill","email":"greg.hill@rackspace.com","username":"jimbobhickville"},"change_message_id":"20dba4aa385dc66373100951c10d42de824241c5","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":290,"context_line":"        arg_mapping_kwargs.update(kwargs)"},{"line_number":291,"context_line":"        self._build_arg_mapping(**arg_mapping_kwargs)"},{"line_number":292,"context_line":""},{"line_number":293,"context_line":"    def remap_args_for_revert(self, **kwargs):"},{"line_number":294,"context_line":"        self._arg_mapping_method_name \u003d \u0027revert\u0027"},{"line_number":295,"context_line":"        self._rebuild_arg_mapping(**kwargs)"},{"line_number":296,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"da6ed579_482f0e88","line":293,"in_reply_to":"da6ed579_a2a28ffb","updated":"2016-01-14 14:43:04.000000000","message":"Yeah, I can, it just gets tedious to maintain if you add a new kwarg to the method it\u0027s passing through to.  I wish there was a way to tell Python \"this method takes the same arguments as this other method\" so you could just define them one place.  Oh well.","commit_id":"6c187e5edca784b2d4cebc7b51017e78269730ae"}]}