)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":5196,"name":"Matthew Treinish","email":"mtreinish@kortar.org","username":"treinish"},"change_message_id":"0b185450a0e5d3149923abe6ea68f9afcaf8a774","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"Counts of \u0027uxsuccess\u0027 are also summarized as \"Unexpected Success\"."},{"line_number":17,"context_line":""},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"It\u0027s unclear how to effectively automate testing of this. Manual"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"testing returns the expected results."},{"line_number":20,"context_line":""},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"Change-Id: I5b1458f9a98712ea3e424d2c9610b915055138af"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":3,"id":"da86d52c_b1e90981","line":19,"updated":"2015-02-18 23:37:20.000000000","message":"Well, we could add basic tests with sample subunit streams and capturing the stdout after to ensure things are printed as expected. The other option would be super mocking things (which would probably be too synthetic to have any value)\n\nBut, I\u0027m fine without having tests on this patch. In the future they\u0027ll be good to add but for right now I think we\u0027re fine.","commit_id":"e29ec710eff862c0be03755e87b25ddb048d6d2a"}]}
