)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"ba5e52b9675db7cce8c6864f3050f8383e8e9c62","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"Negative unrealistic NUMA test"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"The test requests a high number of numa cells, that the gate should"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"not be able to satisfy."},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"It validates that numa settings in extra_specs are being considered"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"and makes sure that the request will fail with a relevant exception."},{"line_number":13,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"3a961159_3c9361a4","line":10,"updated":"2015-01-05 18:01:34.000000000","message":"This really needs to be unrealistic for any real system, right? If I\u0027m a deployer and I have really fancy machines, it would be really bad if tempest claimed things were broken simply because I was able to satisfy the \"unrealistic\" requirement with my fancy machines.\n\nIs 16 numa cells really unfathomably large?","commit_id":"d2087f9b867f6c1f23bd79f54f49188b6296d894"}],"tempest/api/compute/servers/test_create_server.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"bc7715cf21f6c8438cca52e32887923fcf963135","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":297,"context_line":""},{"line_number":298,"context_line":"        self.assertEqual(202, resp.status)"},{"line_number":299,"context_line":""},{"line_number":300,"context_line":"    @test.attr(type\u003d[\u0027negative\u0027, \u0027gate\u0027])"},{"line_number":301,"context_line":"    def test_create_server_with_unrealistic_numa(self):"},{"line_number":302,"context_line":""},{"line_number":303,"context_line":"        def flavor_clean_up(flavor_id):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3a961159_04cf8a2a","line":300,"updated":"2015-01-12 11:01:39.000000000","message":"As with the previous test - we need to make sure that the filter is enabled.","commit_id":"d2087f9b867f6c1f23bd79f54f49188b6296d894"},{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"bc7715cf21f6c8438cca52e32887923fcf963135","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":305,"context_line":"            self.assertEqual(resp.status, 202)"},{"line_number":306,"context_line":"            self.flavor_client.wait_for_resource_deletion(flavor_id)"},{"line_number":307,"context_line":""},{"line_number":308,"context_line":"        ram \u003d 1"},{"line_number":309,"context_line":"        vcpus \u003d 16"},{"line_number":310,"context_line":"        disk \u003d 0"},{"line_number":311,"context_line":"        numa_spec \u003d {\u0027hw:numa_nodes\u0027: \u002716\u0027,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3a961159_44519262","line":308,"updated":"2015-01-12 11:01:39.000000000","message":"This will definitely fail as I believe our code checks that total ram is the sum of cell ram - and if it does not - it should :)\n\nWith this we are only testing that part - while I think testing that the filter acutally rejects it is more valuable. There is no good way to tell with black box testing like this though.","commit_id":"d2087f9b867f6c1f23bd79f54f49188b6296d894"},{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"bc7715cf21f6c8438cca52e32887923fcf963135","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":308,"context_line":"        ram \u003d 1"},{"line_number":309,"context_line":"        vcpus \u003d 16"},{"line_number":310,"context_line":"        disk \u003d 0"},{"line_number":311,"context_line":"        numa_spec \u003d {\u0027hw:numa_nodes\u0027: \u002716\u0027,"},{"line_number":312,"context_line":"                     \u0027hw:numa_cpus.0\u0027: \u00270\u0027,"},{"line_number":313,"context_line":"                     \u0027hw:numa_mem.0\u0027: \u00271\u0027,"},{"line_number":314,"context_line":"                     \u0027hw:numa_cpus.1\u0027: \u00271\u0027,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3a961159_9f2e638b","line":311,"updated":"2015-01-12 11:01:39.000000000","message":"You can just specify this and Nova should figure out everything else - which is I think fine for a negative test and will make changing the code easier.","commit_id":"d2087f9b867f6c1f23bd79f54f49188b6296d894"}]}