)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":7350,"name":"Jordan Pittier","email":"jordan.pittier@gmail.com","username":"JordanP"},"change_message_id":"ff78eddee74bfff53461ff8b7b5b0fc951da7270","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":6,"context_line":""},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"test_instance_access_secg_rule_with_remote_ip_pref"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"ix_any"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"This test verifies the instance access associated"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"security group rule refers remote_ip_prefix to"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"any ip just by refering 0.0.0.0/0"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"ba7be1f8_100cbaa4","line":9,"updated":"2015-03-31 14:09:02.000000000","message":"Hum ?","commit_id":"9cbafacfd7638cadf66831ef5f806dde823989bb"},{"author":{"_account_id":13219,"name":"Thalabathy Venkatesan","email":"thalabathy.venkatesan@hp.com","username":"thalabathy.venkatesanhp.com"},"change_message_id":"039059ea62d6fcbb759d010f55283c9fa388f04b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":6,"context_line":""},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"test_instance_access_secg_rule_with_remote_ip_pref"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"ix_any"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"This test verifies the instance access associated"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"security group rule refers remote_ip_prefix to"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"any ip just by refering 0.0.0.0/0"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"da9b358b_3d133d0f","line":9,"in_reply_to":"ba7be1f8_100cbaa4","updated":"2015-04-01 04:20:40.000000000","message":"Hello Jordan,\n\nThanks for reviewing my test case.\nThe line you referring is the continuation of the above line. we do have limitation that max 50char should be the there in the line. \nPlease suggest me how to overcome this.","commit_id":"9cbafacfd7638cadf66831ef5f806dde823989bb"},{"author":{"_account_id":7350,"name":"Jordan Pittier","email":"jordan.pittier@gmail.com","username":"JordanP"},"change_message_id":"ff78eddee74bfff53461ff8b7b5b0fc951da7270","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"test_instance_access_secg_rule_with_remote_ip_pref"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"ix_any"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"This test verifies the instance access associated"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"security group rule refers remote_ip_prefix to"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"any ip just by refering 0.0.0.0/0"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"ba7be1f8_70fa5676","line":10,"updated":"2015-03-31 14:09:02.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t understand this sentence. Could you try to elaborate or rephrase it please ?","commit_id":"9cbafacfd7638cadf66831ef5f806dde823989bb"},{"author":{"_account_id":13219,"name":"Thalabathy Venkatesan","email":"thalabathy.venkatesan@hp.com","username":"thalabathy.venkatesanhp.com"},"change_message_id":"039059ea62d6fcbb759d010f55283c9fa388f04b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"test_instance_access_secg_rule_with_remote_ip_pref"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"ix_any"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"This test verifies the instance access associated"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"security group rule refers remote_ip_prefix to"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"any ip just by refering 0.0.0.0/0"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"da9b358b_3db8dde4","line":10,"in_reply_to":"ba7be1f8_70fa5676","updated":"2015-04-01 04:20:40.000000000","message":"Hello Jordan,\n\nUse case to use remore_ip prefix attribute while creating rule. here 0.0.0.0/0 refers instance can accept traffic on ingress direction all the source IP(remote_ip).\nAlso when we we use horizon to create rules with out remote_ip prefix it appends the remote_ip prefix as 0.0.0.0/0\n\nPlease revert me back if you need more detail","commit_id":"9cbafacfd7638cadf66831ef5f806dde823989bb"}],"tempest/scenario/test_security_groups_basic_ops.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":5803,"name":"Attila Fazekas","email":"afazekas@redhat.com","username":"afazekas"},"change_message_id":"df6ff1710fa418e733ddbcb5317e64a3df96afe4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":80,"context_line":"           associated with the vm"},{"line_number":81,"context_line":"        12. _test_instance_access_secg_rule_with_remote_ip_prefix_any: test"},{"line_number":82,"context_line":"           instance access with security group rule contains remote_ip_prefix"},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"           refers any(i.e. 0.0.0.0/0)"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":""},{"line_number":85,"context_line":"    assumptions:"},{"line_number":86,"context_line":"        1. alt_tenant/user existed and is different from primary_tenant/user"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"ba7be1f8_9d7ea168","line":83,"updated":"2015-02-26 15:30:09.000000000","message":"without port or port range specification.","commit_id":"9cbafacfd7638cadf66831ef5f806dde823989bb"}]}