)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"1782e93040b220dd9f5d4a71a030ae6087915a59","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"97e2bf73_5293bc8f","updated":"2022-11-30 09:07:51.000000000","message":"I proposed this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/863163 which will exclude all tests which take longer than approx. 100s - I\u0027ve been told it\u0027s a known failure that certain operations on fips env take longer, so maybe excluding some of the tests until the issue is resolved is more CI resource friendly than increasing the timeout, wdyt?","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"9df37b7a908d8fddca3adfb757c0ab8c6285769c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"74ef88b3_9e557217","updated":"2022-11-30 17:05:11.000000000","message":"check experimental","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"8ef38d0b3af322de06b9f808242f65b0bde40597","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"86bb18de_6e34b57c","updated":"2022-12-06 21:01:54.000000000","message":"let\u0027s proceed with this, i first thought we could skip some long-taking tests, but after a discussion with clark, the concern of skipping the tests would be that they would be skipped forever as right now there is no active bug/effort trying to speed up those tests (well, the operations behind those, like spawning a VM)\n\nhttps://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-qa/%23openstack-qa.2022-11-30.log.html","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"90c9da6ed77edb7e79834e7badb6a7b8e2a225a7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"85fc5359_2bfcd162","updated":"2022-12-06 16:27:56.000000000","message":"looks like the extended timeout works. though i also agree with Martin that if it is possible then let\u0027s skip the extremely long test cases until they get fixed.\nOn the other hand, this is in experimental and periodic pipelines, so probably not that harmful if we increase the timeout.","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"7ae4db8e637e2f9d8a5fc50659dc640fc41561bc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ff0060d3_9a4c7cbb","updated":"2022-12-19 19:03:29.000000000","message":"recheck a post failure in of the jobs which is quite stable otherwise ","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"363a8835d9fbf508186e938461a45004553d56bd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"48c2220c_9bfb60f1","updated":"2022-12-07 14:16:17.000000000","message":"recheck a random post failure","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"ecc47787b096a63533cc6681c71d326dd0055ef4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"71f65547_306a827f","updated":"2022-12-21 14:02:47.000000000","message":"recheck damn tempest issue","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"e83d8463f33bc0426eddbe4f80209eebcd53296e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ba8d7646_1ce143be","updated":"2022-12-06 10:03:34.000000000","message":"recheck random error","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"6205d84738add9a57502d0131f450ffab49eae52","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0ad1ab92_3ec96b13","updated":"2022-12-20 12:19:58.000000000","message":"recheck random issue ","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"acf471d0635e7ba93728dac795f9adc989080141","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b5a4f015_040b5039","updated":"2022-12-24 05:40:05.000000000","message":"recheck ssh timeout, let\u0027s see if this improve the situation","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"e4ae9dd1ada355237c99fec992b74ff2da1660cd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"38c7e014_0e628813","updated":"2022-12-19 11:08:05.000000000","message":"recheck the multinode job is unstable","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"336b6fa81119915798535592d4e187789a6bcb91","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0cfae7c7_b67983e8","updated":"2022-11-30 23:36:26.000000000","message":"recheck the new timeout is enough for the cs-9-fips job","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"855b167267ae24805164c545f7e140ce95d8bcdf","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"c4d64dfb_5ad83736","updated":"2022-12-15 19:20:21.000000000","message":"recheck timeout on one test in the slow job","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"3c565691d0d399f79e691ca53c73474c014e4f07","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ac375aa7_9338acbc","updated":"2023-01-05 09:14:49.000000000","message":"recheck tox error should be fixed by now","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":22873,"name":"Martin Kopec","email":"mkopec@redhat.com","username":"mkopec"},"change_message_id":"0fd3fc5d22214a4126250183a4b69fbd541d11fb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2378628f_cd0392de","updated":"2022-12-13 15:28:24.000000000","message":"recheck tox issue got fixed (workarounded)","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"0b994ad9c8e423de5aec66463a6986d1e7c9d8dd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"21342d90_7be20755","updated":"2022-12-08 07:56:18.000000000","message":"recheck tox4","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"},{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"df440f43c047c7addaf6efdb207d4ef9ce0f7baf","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2bc48b21_3d1505a2","in_reply_to":"97e2bf73_5293bc8f","updated":"2022-12-06 16:15:44.000000000","message":"\u003e maybe excluding some of the tests until the issue is resolved is more CI resource friendly than increasing the timeout, wdyt?\n\nI honestly dunno. We *already* waste CI resources every periodic run as nova uses this job. That being said, given it\u0027s a periodic run, for me, I think it\u0027s simplier to just add timeouts.\n\nThat being said, if other projects start using this job on the check pipeline, I\u0027d totally understand your concerns.","commit_id":"b8f0c30f9c9aa67032d04a6fd263b90fd540421b"}]}