)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":30126,"name":"Luca Miccini","email":"lmiccini@redhat.com","username":"lmiccini2"},"change_message_id":"051e60eeb3cc8e9753d0e7647e6e7d4b26a27f4a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"124b3ea1_ac256203","updated":"2022-08-02 12:59:26.000000000","message":"Leaving \u003c%net_cidr%\u003e aside, I think we should be careful here. If we were to do this we should take into account things like spine/leaf (and bgp), composable networks and pacemaker_remote nodes.\nFwiw, pacemaker uses the ctlplane network only if there is no network isolation, otherwise it uses the internal-api but you can also override pcsd_bind_addr so it will be tricky to cover all edge cases. \nIn any case both ctlplane and internal_api should be isolated and secured vlans so adding the \u0027source\u0027 to the iptables rules is a plus but not mandatory imho.","commit_id":"e0200a8dc147fdea50a4098acaa290a4eab0d04d"}],"deployment/pacemaker/pacemaker-baremetal-puppet.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":6926,"name":"Bogdan Dobrelya","email":"bdobreli@redhat.com","username":"bogdando"},"change_message_id":"d9f16f7ac0c679cd3f45133b706c0fb6b6d58bf1","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":142,"context_line":"            - 2224"},{"line_number":143,"context_line":"            - 3121"},{"line_number":144,"context_line":"            - 21064"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"          source: \u003c%net_cidr%\u003e"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"        \u0027131 pacemaker udp\u0027:"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"          proto: \u0027udp\u0027"},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"          dport: 5405"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"3729f25c_676cd262","line":145,"updated":"2022-07-14 16:29:09.000000000","message":"hm, where from this value comes?","commit_id":"e0200a8dc147fdea50a4098acaa290a4eab0d04d"}]}