)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":32926,"name":"Jiri Podivin","display_name":"jpodivin","email":"jpodivin@redhat.com","username":"jpodivin"},"change_message_id":"6f5824acedfe7b8e2973784360f0bfe85789228f","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":10,"context_line":"was custom rule to allow get it for policy (ext_parent) owner as policy"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"rules don\u0027t have tenant_id attribute itself."},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"Instead of using this \"custom\" check there, let\u0027s use"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"\"rule:ext_parent_owner\" which is already defined there. It also used"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"\"tenant_id\" instead of \"project_id\" and for some reason that makes those"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"rules working properly."},{"line_number":16,"context_line":""},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"Related: rhbz#2196291"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"Change-Id: I8b0501e7e3a994d40d37c983b1f0c073fd69e969"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"e4033a67_6acceda5","line":15,"range":{"start_line":13,"start_character":55,"end_line":15,"end_character":23},"updated":"2023-05-26 07:27:09.000000000","message":"It may just be me, but this formulation seems rather unclear.\nDid the rule work with \"tenant_id\" and it doesn\u0027t use it any more? Or is that the current state of affairs?","commit_id":"1e181ffbae66c3e1e8d399bb321e77cb6ee1ad3f"},{"author":{"_account_id":32926,"name":"Jiri Podivin","display_name":"jpodivin","email":"jpodivin@redhat.com","username":"jpodivin"},"change_message_id":"6444f21cc5860ffe53a2b6e5eeea8c6cb039e433","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":10,"context_line":"was custom rule to allow get it for policy (ext_parent) owner as policy"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"rules don\u0027t have tenant_id attribute itself."},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"Instead of using this \"custom\" check there, let\u0027s use"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"\"rule:ext_parent_owner\" which is already defined there. It also used"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"\"tenant_id\" instead of \"project_id\" and for some reason that makes those"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"rules working properly."},{"line_number":16,"context_line":""},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"Related: rhbz#2196291"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"Change-Id: I8b0501e7e3a994d40d37c983b1f0c073fd69e969"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"5b85300f_9f8fa316","line":15,"range":{"start_line":13,"start_character":55,"end_line":15,"end_character":23},"in_reply_to":"77b3d2b6_c8fa1f48","updated":"2023-05-26 08:08:23.000000000","message":"I see. This could be something to investigate, but since we\u0027ve retired OOO I wouldn\u0027t focus on that too much.\nThanks a lot for clarification. I just wanted to be sure I\u0027m not missing part of the picture.","commit_id":"1e181ffbae66c3e1e8d399bb321e77cb6ee1ad3f"},{"author":{"_account_id":11975,"name":"Slawek Kaplonski","email":"skaplons@redhat.com","username":"slaweq"},"change_message_id":"8b6e3bf073112bb9994feffa61843567708b6824","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":10,"context_line":"was custom rule to allow get it for policy (ext_parent) owner as policy"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"rules don\u0027t have tenant_id attribute itself."},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"Instead of using this \"custom\" check there, let\u0027s use"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"\"rule:ext_parent_owner\" which is already defined there. It also used"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"\"tenant_id\" instead of \"project_id\" and for some reason that makes those"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"rules working properly."},{"line_number":16,"context_line":""},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"Related: rhbz#2196291"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"Change-Id: I8b0501e7e3a994d40d37c983b1f0c073fd69e969"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"77b3d2b6_c8fa1f48","line":15,"range":{"start_line":13,"start_character":55,"end_line":15,"end_character":23},"in_reply_to":"e4033a67_6acceda5","updated":"2023-05-26 07:46:39.000000000","message":"So, in u/s master branch we are using project_id and it works fine. But for some reason it don\u0027t works in OSP-17.1 using those custom policies with project_id. Most likely it\u0027s missing some backport to stable/wallaby.","commit_id":"1e181ffbae66c3e1e8d399bb321e77cb6ee1ad3f"}]}