)]}'
{"virtualbmc/vbmc.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":10239,"name":"Dmitry Tantsur","email":"dtantsur@protonmail.com","username":"dtantsur"},"change_message_id":"b1090355d0475d52e10b409a0631e34274278557","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":30,"context_line":"# https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-briefs/ipmi-second-gen-interface-spec-v2-rev1-1.pdf"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"#"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"# Command failed and can be retried"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"IPMI_RAKP_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES \u003d 0x01"},{"line_number":34,"context_line":"# Invalid data field in request"},{"line_number":35,"context_line":"IPMI_INVALID_DATA \u003d 0xcc"},{"line_number":36,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"9f6a8fd7_c91f546e","line":33,"range":{"start_line":33,"start_character":35,"end_line":33,"end_character":39},"updated":"2018-05-02 16:04:33.000000000","message":"I think we should return 0xC0 \"node busy\" and make ironic retry on it. This code looks incorrect, and, furthermore, seems vendor-specific.","commit_id":"b62739f39aa59f07cef0fd803b0a0d82b8fae079"}]}