)]}'
{"watcher_dashboard/test/test_data/watcher_data.py":[{"robot_id":"zuul","robot_run_id":"22a228af24ca40cf83a47cc939e291f9","url":"https://zuul.teim.app/t/main/buildset/22a228af24ca40cf83a47cc939e291f9","author":{"_account_id":28006,"name":"teim-ci","display_name":"teim-ci","email":"ci@seanmooney.info","username":"ci-sean-mooney","status":"this is a third-party ci account run by sean-k-mooney on irc\nhosted at zuul.teim.app"},"tag":"autogenerated:zuul:automatic-ci","change_message_id":"540a77562d3a1a04da8c0ce4e55316263b9aa15e","patch_set":4,"id":"652bc758_263312f7","line":55,"updated":"2026-04-04 01:41:25.000000000","message":"Fixture data uses EfficacyIndicatorSpec objects directly in goal dicts instead of plain dicts. Consider using raw JSON-like dicts and letting the Goal wrapper handle conversion for better test isolation.\n\n**Severity**: SUGGESTION | **Confidence**: 0.8\n\n**Benefit**: Better test isolation: fixtures would test the full data transformation pipeline (raw JSON to wrapped model) rather than only testing the post-wrapping behavior. If EfficacyIndicatorSpec construction changes, tests would catch the regression.\n\n**Recommendation**:\nIn a follow-up change, consider replacing spec1/spec2 with plain dicts like {\u0027name\u0027: \u0027spec1\u0027} in goal_dict entries, consistent with how action_dict1 uses plain dicts. The watcher.Goal wrapper would then receive raw JSON-like data, which more accurately mirrors the real API response.","commit_id":"cf41e8fc29fee44875218b4407d3ca19672c7705"}],"watcher_dashboard/tests/test_data/watcher_data.py":[{"robot_id":"zuul","robot_run_id":"6474c1531db44833a462e8b4ca2a6bc9","url":"https://zuul.teim.app/t/main/buildset/6474c1531db44833a462e8b4ca2a6bc9","author":{"_account_id":28006,"name":"teim-ci","display_name":"teim-ci","email":"ci@seanmooney.info","username":"ci-sean-mooney","status":"this is a third-party ci account run by sean-k-mooney on irc\nhosted at zuul.teim.app"},"tag":"autogenerated:zuul:automatic-ci","change_message_id":"5d3cc3beb98e6d291e51fc2afa8113ff48ceee59","patch_set":5,"id":"07f60172_131236a5","line":47,"updated":"2026-04-30 18:24:09.000000000","message":"The local variables efficacy_specifications_dict1, efficacy_specifications_dict2 still use the old plural form \u0027specifications\u0027 while the dict key was corrected to singular \u0027specification\u0027. Renaming them would improve consistency.\n\n**Severity**: SUGGESTION | **Confidence**: 0.8\n\n**Benefit**: Improved code clarity and alignment with the corrected attribute name, reducing confusion for future contributors reading the fixture.\n\n**Recommendation**:\nRename efficacy_specifications_dict1 to efficacy_specification_dict1 and efficacy_specifications_dict2 to efficacy_specification_dict2 for consistency with the corrected key name.","commit_id":"69ecd095e46f3539b59140c5a88d733696aeaf47"}]}