)]}'
{"tuskar_ui/api.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":8042,"name":"Jiří Stránský","email":"jistr@redhat.com","username":"jistr"},"change_message_id":"d728c0771e30be92e4dfe8fdaa973e6ad2ebf05c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":236,"context_line":"    @cached_property"},{"line_number":237,"context_line":"    def tuskar_node(self):"},{"line_number":238,"context_line":"        node \u003d next((tuskar_node"},{"line_number":239,"context_line":"                     for tuskar_node in TuskarNode.list(self.request)"},{"line_number":240,"context_line":"                     if tuskar_node.nova_baremetal_node_id \u003d\u003d self.id),"},{"line_number":241,"context_line":"                    None)"},{"line_number":242,"context_line":"        return node"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"AAAATn%2F%2BtSU%3D","line":239,"updated":"2013-11-21 09:27:29.000000000","message":"I think this would deserve some optimization on Tuskar API side, e.g. query parameter for the list action, filtering by baremetal node id.\n\nThis only applies if we decide to have the nodes in Tuskar at all in the future (maybe we\u0027ll have them just in Ironic?).\n\nNot a blocker for this patch of course, just a comment.","commit_id":"12199991773ad1499fc4dab560d3d8c77fd187d9"}]}