)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":33341,"name":"Maor Blaustein","email":"mblue@redhat.com","username":"blue"},"change_message_id":"bd5e5e92cce754cf16cee7de37581df75e9efff5","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"7950602a_ebbb6f17","updated":"2025-07-08 20:21:34.000000000","message":"recheck failure unrelated to test, passed locally on podified neutron component job","commit_id":"f31015191b0d6d675da21b0c746b11cd623847b7"},{"author":{"_account_id":33341,"name":"Maor Blaustein","email":"mblue@redhat.com","username":"blue"},"change_message_id":"2b6ad7943cd855ee377cf95585904c69424fc3b3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"a1a553ab_13e418d1","updated":"2025-07-09 08:02:14.000000000","message":"Also verified locally on a network component job for relevant tests","commit_id":"3d59bedbe6ad08bee55b580cf965353257bece1a"},{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"d29a0cc1f48832a9bcc33484f8df57d7d6771b45","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"71410628_0b61c6e2","updated":"2025-07-09 19:06:21.000000000","message":"This is a non documented feature. It is possible to define DSCP for router GW ports because in ML2/OVN it works the same as assigning a QoS policy to a port/network.\n\nI don\u0027t understand the FIP -\u003e router GW part, in particular if we have DVR.","commit_id":"3d59bedbe6ad08bee55b580cf965353257bece1a"},{"author":{"_account_id":33341,"name":"Maor Blaustein","email":"mblue@redhat.com","username":"blue"},"change_message_id":"47f11e1f56e85f4f73147635e2fcf4c7b4573658","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"1103764a_8ea16fc7","in_reply_to":"71410628_0b61c6e2","updated":"2025-07-10 15:46:32.000000000","message":"right, thank you, I will set according to findings on LP\nhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2116317","commit_id":"3d59bedbe6ad08bee55b580cf965353257bece1a"},{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"a3676f4540c5061ae69b86c650d8eeb22eaae43f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"fcc130f9_9a5ab10e","updated":"2025-07-15 13:20:57.000000000","message":"Ah, btw, this feature (DSCP for GW port and FIP) won\u0027t work for ML2/OVS. It is needed to consider that in the test execution.","commit_id":"51353ef0053e86a1bb411f96f9de84462a7994f1"},{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"0f4c2370959ac1ce1de311a1ddc83d2521e06463","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"18f31b34_8d3d300a","updated":"2025-07-15 13:19:44.000000000","message":"Minor nits","commit_id":"51353ef0053e86a1bb411f96f9de84462a7994f1"}],"whitebox_neutron_tempest_plugin/tests/scenario/test_qos.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"0f4c2370959ac1ce1de311a1ddc83d2521e06463","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":659,"context_line":"            are marked with a new DSCP mark (since rule for port has higher"},{"line_number":660,"context_line":"            priority)."},{"line_number":661,"context_line":"            8. Create another QoS policy applied to router gateway routing to"},{"line_number":662,"context_line":"            src_server, verify it takes precedence over all other policies."},{"line_number":663,"context_line":"            9. Delete DSCP marking rule from the router gateway QoS policy"},{"line_number":664,"context_line":"            and make sure that traffic is marked for port value again."},{"line_number":665,"context_line":"            10. Create another QoS policy applied to FIP of src_server, verify"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"4ae997e0_4acac828","line":662,"range":{"start_line":662,"start_character":56,"end_line":662,"end_character":74},"updated":"2025-07-15 13:19:44.000000000","message":"the port QoS policies","commit_id":"51353ef0053e86a1bb411f96f9de84462a7994f1"},{"author":{"_account_id":33341,"name":"Maor Blaustein","email":"mblue@redhat.com","username":"blue"},"change_message_id":"79e8badbe788ea57ee043cc504606107a69e6155","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":659,"context_line":"            are marked with a new DSCP mark (since rule for port has higher"},{"line_number":660,"context_line":"            priority)."},{"line_number":661,"context_line":"            8. Create another QoS policy applied to router gateway routing to"},{"line_number":662,"context_line":"            src_server, verify it takes precedence over all other policies."},{"line_number":663,"context_line":"            9. Delete DSCP marking rule from the router gateway QoS policy"},{"line_number":664,"context_line":"            and make sure that traffic is marked for port value again."},{"line_number":665,"context_line":"            10. Create another QoS policy applied to FIP of src_server, verify"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"ec1ea9ce_7cf1db33","line":662,"range":{"start_line":662,"start_character":56,"end_line":662,"end_character":74},"in_reply_to":"4ae997e0_4acac828","updated":"2025-07-15 15:33:36.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"51353ef0053e86a1bb411f96f9de84462a7994f1"},{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"0f4c2370959ac1ce1de311a1ddc83d2521e06463","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":663,"context_line":"            9. Delete DSCP marking rule from the router gateway QoS policy"},{"line_number":664,"context_line":"            and make sure that traffic is marked for port value again."},{"line_number":665,"context_line":"            10. Create another QoS policy applied to FIP of src_server, verify"},{"line_number":666,"context_line":"            it takes precedence over all other policies."},{"line_number":667,"context_line":"            11. Delete DSCP marking rule from the FIP QoS policy"},{"line_number":668,"context_line":"            and make sure that traffic is marked for port value again."},{"line_number":669,"context_line":"            12. Delete DSCP marking rule from the port QoS policy and make sure"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"f61b2e07_bb9e39a7","line":666,"range":{"start_line":666,"start_character":37,"end_line":666,"end_character":55},"updated":"2025-07-15 13:19:44.000000000","message":"the port QoS policies","commit_id":"51353ef0053e86a1bb411f96f9de84462a7994f1"},{"author":{"_account_id":33341,"name":"Maor Blaustein","email":"mblue@redhat.com","username":"blue"},"change_message_id":"79e8badbe788ea57ee043cc504606107a69e6155","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":663,"context_line":"            9. Delete DSCP marking rule from the router gateway QoS policy"},{"line_number":664,"context_line":"            and make sure that traffic is marked for port value again."},{"line_number":665,"context_line":"            10. Create another QoS policy applied to FIP of src_server, verify"},{"line_number":666,"context_line":"            it takes precedence over all other policies."},{"line_number":667,"context_line":"            11. Delete DSCP marking rule from the FIP QoS policy"},{"line_number":668,"context_line":"            and make sure that traffic is marked for port value again."},{"line_number":669,"context_line":"            12. Delete DSCP marking rule from the port QoS policy and make sure"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"0c9d8a40_eed4c79d","line":666,"range":{"start_line":666,"start_character":37,"end_line":666,"end_character":55},"in_reply_to":"f61b2e07_bb9e39a7","updated":"2025-07-15 15:33:36.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"51353ef0053e86a1bb411f96f9de84462a7994f1"}]}