)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9311,"name":"Tristan Cacqueray","email":"tdecacqu@redhat.com","username":"tristanC"},"change_message_id":"750aaf71002c2c8a82f3a04f520070d99e17bd2f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"62ab51b1_f728fa99","updated":"2024-05-16 10:04:23.000000000","message":"Thanks, I don\u0027t think this need a version bump because that\u0027s what the operator already expects, the previous schema was incorrect.\n\nPerhaps this could use a release note, though the zuul-operator does not use reno or have a CHANGELOG to that effect.\n\nFinally, I think the CI is still broken because we need https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-operator/+/881245 which requires https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/zuul-operator/+/852855","commit_id":"b7e52972bf81ecfad82e69592484d58ccf22bc59"},{"author":{"_account_id":36342,"name":"Damian Fajfer","display_name":"fajfer","email":"damian@fajfer.org","username":"fajfer"},"change_message_id":"43c967752bdbf31bf53572ca1e175276c612489a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"77130d87_c62b7dc7","updated":"2024-08-22 12:24:49.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"fef7c272f7e92b5aa414cbeeb7bd943b45d9eecb"},{"author":{"_account_id":25733,"name":"Jan Gutter","email":"github@jangutter.com","username":"jangutter"},"change_message_id":"c828dbd91c3af249502fc61892cf8f36d9adc9be","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"f97f3f73_69fd7e10","updated":"2024-10-02 15:33:45.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"fef7c272f7e92b5aa414cbeeb7bd943b45d9eecb"}]}