)]}'
{"doc/source/discussion/gating.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":1,"name":"James E. Blair","email":"jim@acmegating.com","username":"corvus"},"change_message_id":"22564b042951875cdf3ddd7e22fd33c5dc2e95e1","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":306,"context_line":"   will be required to merge before the second can be enqueued."},{"line_number":307,"context_line":"   Further, Zuul is unaware that there is an outstanding change waiting"},{"line_number":308,"context_line":"   for that merge event, so is unable to automatically enqueue the"},{"line_number":309,"context_line":"   second change, requiring a new approval event to enqueue it instead."},{"line_number":310,"context_line":""},{"line_number":311,"context_line":"Independent Pipeline"},{"line_number":312,"context_line":"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"ff570b3c_99cbd051","line":309,"updated":"2020-05-28 16:03:52.000000000","message":"Even better.  :)","commit_id":"3801ebac184b8d4e9af8d1783bc2ffa2471b2247"},{"author":{"_account_id":1,"name":"James E. Blair","email":"jim@acmegating.com","username":"corvus"},"change_message_id":"f24815bdd8511193ff1e2069a45a4e8810f6b0e8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":306,"context_line":"   will be required to merge before the second can be enqueued."},{"line_number":307,"context_line":"   Further, Zuul is unaware that there is an outstanding change waiting"},{"line_number":308,"context_line":"   for that merge event, so is unable to automatically enqueue the"},{"line_number":309,"context_line":"   second change, requiring a new approval event to enqueue it instead."},{"line_number":310,"context_line":""},{"line_number":311,"context_line":"Independent Pipeline"},{"line_number":312,"context_line":"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"ff570b3c_be1b1a19","line":309,"updated":"2020-05-28 15:33:55.000000000","message":"This describes the situation where both changes are approved, but the original text didn\u0027t assume that.  This case may be worth highlighting, but maybe we should reword it slightly.\n\nMaybe just something like \"Further, if both changes have been approved for merging before the first is enqueued, then Zuul will be unaware....\"","commit_id":"3801ebac184b8d4e9af8d1783bc2ffa2471b2247"},{"author":{"_account_id":5263,"name":"Jeremy Stanley","display_name":"fungi","email":"fungi@yuggoth.org","username":"fungi","status":"missing, presumed fed"},"change_message_id":"0dabfaf82b56542d76c07d157ab3bb0544052906","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":306,"context_line":"   will be required to merge before the second can be enqueued."},{"line_number":307,"context_line":"   Further, Zuul is unaware that there is an outstanding change waiting"},{"line_number":308,"context_line":"   for that merge event, so is unable to automatically enqueue the"},{"line_number":309,"context_line":"   second change, requiring a new approval event to enqueue it instead."},{"line_number":310,"context_line":""},{"line_number":311,"context_line":"Independent Pipeline"},{"line_number":312,"context_line":"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"ff570b3c_f9864c65","line":309,"updated":"2020-05-28 15:56:05.000000000","message":"Well, if the second is approved after the first is enqueued but before the first is merged, it also won\u0027t automatically enqueue the second once the first merges, right? Maybe:\n\n\"If the second change is approved before the first is merged, Zuul can\u0027t act on the approval and won\u0027t automatically enqueue the second change, requiring a new approval event to enqueue it after the first change merges.\"","commit_id":"3801ebac184b8d4e9af8d1783bc2ffa2471b2247"}]}
